When my wife and I moved to Massachusetts nearly a decade ago, we were surprised by how far outside of Boston we had to look to find a home we could afford. Trading in proximity for a lower price is something realtors call “driving to qualify.” By the end of our hunt, we’d purchased a home nearly 35 miles from my office in downtown Boston.

During the real-estate boom, this seemed like a smart tradeoff. Gas averaged $1.15 a gallon when we closed on our house in 1999, and even in my 20-mile-per-gallon SUV, trading higher gas bills for a lower mortgage seemed like a smart choice. (That’s particularly true in my case, since travel and telecommuting alleviate the need for me to drive to the office five days a week.) In fact, even when gas prices hit $3 a gallon in 2005, I boasted in an NPR commentary that my drive still made plenty of sense. “The cost of gas is a bargain compared with the cost of close-to-the-city housing,” I opined at the height of the boom. By buying a cheap house further out, I calculated, I saved $144 in mortgage payments every single time I made my long drive home. “[My commute] may be the most profitable part of my day,” I said, perhaps a bit smugly, in that NPR piece.

Now that gas prices are north of $4, I’m starting to rethink that calculation. And I’m not alone. Last week, the New York Times reported on how “Fuel Prices Shift Math for Life in Far Suburbs.” Earlier this year in the Atlantic Monthly, urban land strategist Christopher Leinberger argued that all those “foreclosure” ane “we buy houses” signs in exurban housing developments are the start of a trend in which suburban communities revert to “slums” as Americans migrate en masse back towards urban centers.

That’s a radical argument, and I think it’s overdrawn. But there’s no doubt homebuyers are paying closer attention to proximity and value, and factoring rising commuting costs into what they’ll pay for a home. My distant suburban home has lost more value than homes closer to Boston, a trend that often holds true during times of price declines. And if the costs of getting to and from work by car continue rising, that discount seems likely to grow.

For buyers confused by just how a commute affects their housing equation, there are a host of websites that can help. For the simplest numbers, try out a website that lets you figure out your annual fuel costs for commuting to work. How much more will you spend if gas hits $4.75? How much would you save if you telecommute a day or two a week—or if you moved to a house that cut your commute in half? With a few clicks, this calculator serves up the answers.

For an overhead look at how residents of different towns face different transportation expenses, consider the Housing and Transportation Costs index, put online by an urban sustainability group called the Center for Neighborhood Technologies. It offers interactive, color-coded maps displaying which towns’ residents spent the most on gas and travel expenses in 2000 and 2008. House hunters worried about commuting costs may want to seek out areas where transportation costs are lower.

This entry was posted on Wednesday, July 2nd, 2008 at 7:07 am and is filed under Real Estate News. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Responses are currently closed, but you can trackback from your own site.