Investors own about one-fifth of Bay Area homes in foreclosure
Sunday, December 16th, 2007We Buy Houses
Israel Medina admits he got too gung ho about the idea of getting rich by flipping Bay Area real estate.
Medina, a Concord resident who ran a limousine company before wading neck-deep into the housing market, has seen not one, but 11, of his Northern California properties move into foreclosure in the past year, he said.
“I was a real estate tycoon; I had everything,” said Medina. “Now I have nothing.”
A Chronicle analysis of public records shows that speculators like Medina played a significant role in the region’s subprime loan meltdown.
These real estate gamblers are hardly the struggling home buyers often portrayed as victims of the Bay Area’s and nation’s foreclosure crisis. Some bought houses as often as other people buy shoes, rarely putting down any money. The speculators were betting that home prices would continue to shoot up. Instead, when the market started softening and prices sagged, many of their properties ended up as foreclosures.
More than one-fifth of 6,557 Bay Area properties that fell into foreclosure from January through September this year were owned by investors, according to a Chronicle analysis of public records compiled by DataQuick Information Systems. Of properties repossessed by lenders, 1 in 6 had been owned by people who had two or more foreclosures in their names. Eighteen Bay Area investors had five or more foreclosures.
“During the frenzied period, you got people rolling the dice and buying as many properties as they could,” said Andrew LePage, an analyst with DataQuick of La Jolla, San Diego County.
Easy money through no-questions-asked subprime mortgages allowed almost anyone to become a real estate speculator. The flood of investors and first-time home buyers into the market helped to fuel the Bay Area’s double-digit price appreciation in recent years.
And while lenders are left holding the unpaid loans for these investments gone bad, experts say the region’s homeowners and the public at large share the pain.
“All of us end up paying in some way for the losses incurred by the lenders,” said Hans Johnson, associate director of the Public Policy Institute of California, who is an expert on housing issues. “And anyone living next to one of these foreclosures would certainly say it affects them.”
The Chronicle’s investigation showed those with multiple foreclosures ranged from naive investors to people who may have been victims of fraud - or committed it themselves. What they all had in common was the hope for a payday.
A working-class Livermore couple bought four investment properties, believing the real estate would finance their children’s college educations; one has gone through foreclosure and others are on the verge. A Marin resident invested $1 million in four properties that a construction company owner told her he would fix up and flip; she lost all the money, her good credit and her own home.
The Marin resident, Rose Hodges, said she attended Marin investment clubs and met many people like herself who wanted to learn how to invest in real estate.
“All these Baby Boomers started inheriting money from their parents and looking for ways to invest it. And the real estate market was booming,” said Hodges, who learned the hard way that such investments can have a big downside. “It’s crazy out there and people ought to know.”
Medina, who got a real estate license early this year, said he dabbled in real estate for years and made some money before gambling too big and buying 11 properties at virtually the same time in early 2006.
